blog : October 2012

The Alternative to Standardized Testing:
Performance Assessment

10/26/2012

Penny wise and pound foolish. When I began my teaching career 25 years ago, as a fresh-faced college graduate, I was trained to view performance assessment as the best means to determine the skill level and achievement of my students. More traditional assessments, like multiple choice quizzes and tests, were discouraged because these did not meet diverse needs of all students and were less effective measures. Today, performance assessment is still identified as the most effective tool for determining student achievement because it manifests what all assessment should be: reliable, varied, and fair.

Yet we do not use performance assessment for large-scale evaluation – sometimes we don’t even use it for small-scale evaluations. Why? Because performance assessment is assumed to be more expensive than standardized testing. But is it really? No Child Left Behind has produced a standardized testing industry in our country. And this is in spite of the fact that standardized testing is an inferior assessment. It is unfair and inadequate. Consider the following:

  • Standardized testing is historically ridden with race, economic and gender biases.

  • Standardized testing does not meet the needs of diverse learners.

  • Standardized tests measure factual (though fragmented) knowledge in some subject areas while totally ignoring others.

  • Standardized testing does not attempt to measure creative thinking and problem solving skills.

Recently, a report from New York Performance Standards Consortium, found that performance assessments in the Consortium schools were a superior indicator in determining student achievement. How does it work? Education for the 21st Century explains that the PBATs (Performance Based Assessment Tasks) “emerge from class readings and discussion. In some classes, the tasks are crafted by the teacher and in other instances by the student.” For example, in literature each student must write and then orally defend an analytic paper based on defined requirements. The report includes samples of the wide range of literature and interests addressed by the students, as well as similar samples for the other required tasks. In the oral defense for each PBAT, the student responds to questions from a panel of teachers and outside experts.

All the tasks and defenses completed for the common graduation requirement are evaluated using Consortium-wide scoring guides ("rubrics"). The report includes the rubrics used to evaluate tasks and defenses. These well-developed assessment standards, written and revised as needed by Consortium teachers, allow accurate evaluations of student work across schools. Samples of the work are independently re-scored (“moderation”) to evaluate both reliability of scoring and the challenge level of teacher assignments.

The report also shares evidence of an increased acceptance into four-year colleges, and an increased success rate in those students accepted to four-year colleges. This is on top of a significantly reduced drop-out rate, and reduced number of discipline issues. In fact, the Consortium schools consistently outperform other New York City public schools that serve similar populations. It’s hard to believe there isn’t a correlation between their adoption of performance assessments and their success rate.

I believe that the single most important different between performance assessments and standardized test assessments is that teachers are integral to the creation and implementation of the former. Teachers, and their influence, are conspicuously absent in NCLB standardized test assessments. This erodes the integrity of the teaching profession. Unlike performance assessments, the assembly-line procedure of standardized test taking does not allow students to demonstrate their developing skills and concept knowledge. Instead, standardized testing minimizes students’ creative thinking and, as such, is a direct threat to the demands of our democratic society. It’s a perfect example of “penny wise and pound foolish”.



April 2015 : 2 posts
March 2015 : 0 posts
February 2015 : 0 posts
January 2015 : 0 posts
December 2014 : 1 post
November 2014 : 4 posts
October 2014 : 5 posts
April 2015 : 2 posts
March 2015 : 0 posts
February 2015 : 0 posts
January 2015 : 0 posts
December 2014 : 1 post
November 2014 : 4 posts
April 2015 : 2 posts
March 2015 : 0 posts
February 2015 : 0 posts
January 2015 : 0 posts
December 2014 : 1 post
November 2014 : 4 posts
October 2014 : 5 posts
September 2014 : 7 posts
August 2014 : 3 posts
July 2014 : 0 posts
June 2014 : 2 posts
May 2014 : 0 posts
April 2014 : 1 post
March 2014 : 1 post
February 2014 : 0 posts
January 2014 : 2 posts
December 2013 : 0 posts
November 2013 : 6 posts
October 2013 : 0 posts
September 2013 : 1 post
August 2013 : 0 posts
July 2013 : 5 posts
June 2013 : 5 posts
May 2013 : 6 posts
April 2013 : 2 posts
March 2013 : 9 posts
February 2013 : 4 posts
January 2013 : 8 posts
December 2012 : 2 posts
November 2012 : 12 posts
October 2012 : 6 posts
September 2012 : 3 posts
August 2012 : 0 posts
July 2012 : 4 posts
June 2012 : 3 posts
May 2012 : 3 posts
April 2012 : 8 posts
March 2012 : 4 posts
February 2012 : 3 posts
January 2012 : 8 posts
December 2011 : 0 posts
November 2011 : 7 posts
October 2011 : 5 posts
September 2011 : 2 posts
August 2011 : 1 posts
July 2011 : 15 posts
June 2011 : 16 posts
May 2011 : 0 posts
April 2011 : 2 posts
March 2011 : 8 posts
February 2011 : 3 posts
January 2011 : 7 posts
December 2010 : 3 posts
November 2010 : 12 posts
October 2010 : 10 posts
September 2010 : 10 posts
August 2010 : 0 posts


Shop!

Subscribe!